Emergency Preparedness and Response Planning

The incident you are least ready for is the one you have never had.

Departments get good at the calls they run often. The exposure sits in the incident that arrives once in a decade: the one that outruns the first alarm, needs three neighbours, or turns the department into one agency inside a municipal response nobody has rehearsed.

Request a consultation

What this covers

Three steps away from a routine call, and the planning gets thinner at each one.

Most departments have something written for the first of these and progressively less for the second and third. The work is usually not starting from nothing. It is finding where the plan stops describing what would happen.

  1. 01

    Beyond routine

    Incidents the department will handle, but not with what is on the first alarm. Escalation thresholds, what gets called and when, and whether the plan matches the resources that exist.

    • Escalation and resource plans
    • Pre incident planning for identified risk
    • Operational contingencies
  2. 02

    Beyond the department

    Incidents that need somebody else. Whether aid arrangements are current, cover what the department is relying on them for, and work on scene rather than only on paper.

    • Mutual and automatic aid arrangements
    • Interoperability with aid partners
    • Command and coordination across agencies
  3. 03

    Beyond the fire service

    Incidents where the department becomes one part of a municipal response. What the department's role is, who it reports to, and whether anyone has practised it before the day.

    • Role within the municipal emergency management structure
    • Coordination and information flow
    • What the department is expected to provide

How the work is done

Planning against what the department has.

A plan built on an assumed turnout, an aid partner who has not agreed, or a capability nobody is current in, fails at the only moment it matters. The work starts with what the department can field, then plans from there.

Where the municipality already has an emergency management plan, the department's role inside it is the subject. Northline works to that structure as the department would. It does not write, own or administer the municipality's emergency management program.

Where exercises fit

A plan is not tested until somebody runs it.

Identifying what needs exercising is part of this work: which scenario, which partners, and what the exercise would have to demonstrate to be worth the hours.

Running the exercise and evaluating it is a separate engagement. It sits with implementation and validation work rather than here, so the same piece of work is not sold twice under two names.

Implementation and Validation

Who it is for

Departments carrying a risk they have never had to answer.

A wildland interface that has grown, a highway or rail corridor, an industrial site, a large occupancy that would exceed the first alarm, or a response area where the nearest meaningful help is a long way out. Also departments where aid arrangements were agreed years ago by people who have since left.

It suits a Chief or Deputy who wants the plan tested against reality before an incident does it for them, and a CAO who has been asked what the municipality would do and does not have a confident answer.

Scope of This Work

This is planning and advisory work for the department. Northline reviews, plans and recommends. The department and the municipality adopt, and remain the authority over what they adopt.

Northline is not the authority having jurisdiction, a regulator, or an emergency management authority for any municipality, and does not act or speak for one. Where a question belongs to the municipality's emergency management function, the work says so and routes it there.

This work confers no certification, accreditation or regulatory approval, and it is not a determination of compliance with any emergency management requirement.

Scope, exclusions and what each side provides are set out in writing before work begins.

Next step

Start with the incident that worries you.

Most of these conversations begin with a specific scenario a Chief has been turning over. That is a better starting point than a scope document, and the engagement gets shaped around it.